Australia’s water debate is not only about drought. It is also about salt. Each year, millions of tonnes of salt are mobilised and many of those salts end up back in our rivers and then back onto our best irrigated farms. The practical solution is not slogans or quick fixes. It is disciplined flushing, timed properly, supported by better irrigation scheduling and better policy. This page explains the logic, the sequence, and what must change.
Latest Water Crisis Videos And Site Sections
This page sits within a wider set of water crisis resources, including:
- Introduction
- Water Crisis Videos
- Droughtproofing in Ethiopia
- More About Water
- Irrigation Scheduling
- Publications
- Contact Us
Salt Will Dominate The Water Debate
Australia is not a “clean slate” landscape. Much of the continent is an ancient sea bed, and salt is part of the geology. Every year we mobilise large quantities of salt across the landscape. Over time, this salinity finds its way back into the river system and is then reapplied to our prime irrigated land. It is slow, it is quiet, and it is destructive. The danger is that it destroys soils that took centuries to form and decades to develop into productive farms.
When salt is reapplied to irrigated land, the damage is not always obvious at first. It accumulates. It shifts up and down through the soil profile. It reduces plant growth long before you see obvious “salt scald” symptoms. That is why salinity can be more dangerous than a visible drought: it can degrade land while people argue about short-term allocations.
Why We Need To Flush
Irrigation water is never pure. Every time we irrigate, we apply some salt onto our land. Even good-quality water carries dissolved salts. The salts are left behind as water is taken up by plants or lost through evaporation. If you keep applying water without a plan for salt, salinity steadily increases.
The practical solution is flushing. That means applying extra water at the right time so the salt is moved away from the root zone rather than being allowed to concentrate where plants must feed. Flushing is not a luxury. It is a basic requirement for long-term irrigation, because irrigation is effectively an evaporation system that concentrates salts.
The Wrong Way To Flush
There is a right way and a wrong way to use irrigation water for flushing. The wrong way is to apply a small “extra bit” of flushing water on every irrigation. It feels sensible because it sounds gentle and safe. In reality, it often causes a salt build-up just below the root zone.
When salt builds below the roots, it does not simply stay put. Under osmotic pressure, salts can migrate back toward the root zone. That means the crop is still exposed to salt stress, even though you have been “flushing a little” all season. In other words, the wrong flushing method can look like good management while quietly setting up the next problem.
The Right Way To Flush
The right approach is more disciplined. On each normal irrigation, apply just enough water to meet plant needs, or even slightly less, so that the soil below the root zone is allowed to dry out. This matters because it helps prevent salt from steadily accumulating in the wrong place and reduces the tendency for salts to drift back up.
Then, when the salt level rises to the top end of what is acceptable, you apply a much larger irrigation to flush the salt well away from the root zone. The aim is not to “nudge” the salt. The aim is to move it decisively beyond the area where roots are active. This creates a clear separation between day-to-day irrigation and occasional flushing events.
This is not about being wasteful. It is about controlling where salt sits in the soil profile over time. The day-to-day discipline saves water and protects the root zone. The periodic flush protects the farm over the long term.
How Much Water And When?
The hardest part for many irrigators is not agreeing with the principle. It is the practical question: how much water do I apply, and when do I do the bigger flush? That is where scheduling and measurement become essential. Guesswork is expensive, and in salinity management, guessing wrong can quietly degrade a farm.
The software program I-Planner was designed to address exactly this. It calculates the amount of salt applied and the amount flushed at each irrigation. In practical terms, that means the system can indicate when a flush is needed and how much water is required to do a proper flush, based on the salt balance rather than on habit or tradition.
When salt is treated as a balance problem, decisions become clearer. Instead of arguing about whether flushing is “good” or “bad,” the question becomes: what is the salt load, where is it likely to be sitting in the profile, and what is the minimum effective action to shift it away from roots?
Where Does The Salt Go First?
A reasonable question follows: if you flush salt, where does it go? If you are in a drained area, the salt will be flushed more quickly back into the river system. If you are not in a drained area, the salt still tends to end up in the river, but it may take much longer. Either way, salt movement is part of the whole catchment system, not just a farm-scale issue.
And flushing is not the only source of salt in the river. Extra salt also enters from dryland salinity. Each year, about 5 million tonnes of salt is dumped into the Murray system. This means that the river is not only carrying “today’s” salt from irrigation; it is also carrying salt released from the landscape more broadly.
And After That? Back Onto Our Farms
The story becomes more alarming when we consider what happens next. If salt enters the river but is not flushed out to sea, it remains in the system. When there is limited outflow, the salt that is dumped into the river ends up being redistributed through the same irrigation network that supports our premium food-producing land.
At times when there is little or no flow out of the Murray mouth, this becomes a serious warning sign. If salt is not leaving the system, it is cycling within it. That means the salt can be reapplied to the very land that provides much of our food supply and rural wealth. Salinity then becomes not a theoretical environmental problem, but a direct risk to national production.
What Must We Do? Flush Salt Out To Sea
To protect irrigated agriculture and river health, we must ensure there is enough water to flush salt out to sea. This is the uncomfortable part, because it requires accepting that salinity control is not achieved by half-measures. It requires flow, timing, and policy settings that allow flushing when nature provides the opportunity.
Do not be deluded by salt intercept schemes as the whole answer. They may remove a fraction of the salt entering the river, but they do not remove the fundamental need for flushing. Interception may help at the margins, but it does not replace the requirement to move salt through the system and out of it.
There is simply no alternative to flushing the salt out to sea if we want long-term sustainability for the river system and the farms that depend on it.
Live With The Flood And Drought Cycle
Nature is not neat or orderly. We move through droughts, then rains, then floods. The mistake is to treat drought as the only time to think seriously about water, and then return to business-as-usual when the rains come. That is exactly backwards if salinity is the long-term threat.
In drought, water saving becomes urgent. But when the rains and floods return, that is when we should be flushing salt off our land and filling reservoirs so they are ready for the next drought. The “wet years” are not just a relief. They are the window of opportunity to reset the system: flush, replenish, and prepare.
Farmers And Environmental Flows Are Not Opponents
Water politics often turns into a tired fight: farmers versus “greenies,” production versus environment, one side blamed for the other side’s problems. This framing is unhelpful. Most farmers want their land to be sustainable, because it is their livelihood and their legacy. People who want to protect the environment want functioning rivers and wetlands, because those systems underpin long-term productivity.
Both interests converge on a key idea: environmental flows during rainy periods. If we use the wet periods properly—flushing salt and restoring systems—then both farming and environmental outcomes improve. The conflict is often not between goals, but between short-term incentives and long-term necessity.
Change Our Policies
The politics of water has trained the community to expect cheap and readily available water. That expectation has encouraged inefficient use. Policies must be reversed. Water needs to be treated as a scarce and expensive commodity, because in drought years that is exactly what it is.
At the same time, farmers should not be left to carry the full cost of change. Many inefficient practices were encouraged by past policy settings and infrastructure choices. If society wants the irrigation sector to modernise and protect the river system, then farmers need practical help to become more efficient—through technology support, transition assistance, and policies that reward outcomes rather than just volume.
Only One Practical Salinity Solution: Use Water Better
There is only one workable salinity solution at scale: make better use of the water we have. That means:
- Applying irrigation water with discipline, so most irrigations do not push water past the root zone.
- Using planned, occasional flushing events to push salt well away from the roots.
- Ensuring river systems have sufficient flow in wet periods to flush salt out to sea.
- Aligning policy settings so long-term sustainability is rewarded rather than undermined.
This website is offered as a constructive contribution by focusing on technologies and practical thinking that help Australia use water more effectively. The point is not to win arguments. The point is to keep farms productive, protect soils, and keep rivers functioning over the long term.
Return to home page
Contact: colinaustin@bigpond.com
